<button id="imseu"></button>
  • <rt id="imseu"></rt>
    <li id="imseu"><source id="imseu"></source></li>
  • <button id="imseu"><input id="imseu"></input></button>
    <table id="imseu"></table>
  • <strike id="imseu"></strike>
    查看: 3840|回復(fù): 1
    打印 上一主題 下一主題

    [畜牧英語] Control of Salmonella in the Pork Production Chain

    [復(fù)制鏈接]
    跳轉(zhuǎn)到指定樓層
    樓主
    發(fā)表于 2008-9-27 10:56:51 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
    Salmonellosis is a major food borne disease threat to public health. In Canada, Salmonella is the second most common bacterial food borne pathogen (after Campylobacter) for which swine serve as a reservoir. Salmonella has a complex epidemiology. Despite copious research, there has been little progress in identifying cost-effective interventions for Salmonella on-farm. Significant strides have been made at decreasing Salmonella contamination at slaughter and processing and it is expected that standards in abattoirs will become more stringent, creating pressure to reduce prevalence of Salmonella-positive swine through on-farm interventions.


    Potential On-Farm Control Points

    1. Humans and Other Animals as Vectors
    Both entrance biosecurity practices for personnel and visitors and higher herd health status have been associated with decreased Salmonella risk for swine. Rodents, birds and invertebrate animals are all known to be potential carriers of Salmonella, but the actual risk posed by them to swine is unclear.

    2. Environmental Contamination
    Salmonella is capable of surviving at least six years in the environment. A recent study reported that high prevalence farms tended to have more residual contamination of feeders and equipment after barn cleaning than low prevalence farms, suggesting that more stringent cleaning is associated with decreased prevalence.

    3. Pig Flow
    Few studies have identified all-in/all-out pig flow as being associated with decreased Salmonella prevalence. In fact, Salmonella prevalence can be quite high on farms with all-in/all-out production. The limited and contradictory evidence in the literature warrants further investigation.

    4. Feed
    Animal feeds and feedstuffs can be contaminated with Salmonella. Appropriate decontamination steps are needed during feed processing to reduce contamination of feedstuffs in order to avoid dissemination of contaminated feed to herds. However, the role of contaminated feed in the epidemiology of Salmonella on swine farms is questionable. In a multi-country survey in Europe, Salmonella was isolated from feedstuffs in 17.6% of herds and 6.9% of all samples. Yet, the Salmonella serotypes isolated from the feeds were not the same serotypes isolated from pigs on those farms.

    Many epidemiological studies have found that pigs fed pelleted rations were at increased risk of high Salmonella seroprevalence compared to those fed diets in meal form. Additionally, diets that are acidified, either as a result of the addition of whey, organic acids, or are fermented have been associated with reduced Salmonella prevalence. Conversely, wet, but not fermented, diets have been associated with increased Salmonella prevalence.

    5. Vaccine
    Vaccination is associated with reduced Salmonella prevalence in swine at slaughter. Unfortunately there are few quality published studies sufficient to assess the value of the intervention.

    6. Thermal Environment
    There is an association between season and/or environmental temperature and Salmonella prevalence in finishing swine. Recent work has demonstrated increased prevalence in winter and spring.

    7. Antimicrobial Use
    Field investigations have shown variable results with antimicrobials on controlling Salmonella prevalence on farms. The impact on shedding may be associated with the antimicrobial resistance profile.

    8. Cost-Effectiveness
    There is minimal data regarding the evaluation of cost-efficacy of different interventions on Salmonella control. In a Danish study, the variables with the maximum effect on Salmonella prevalence on carcasses were:

        * the number of herds with a high prevalence of Salmonella,
         * singeing efficiency,
         * contamination and cross-contamination at degutting and
         * cross-contamination during handling.

    Interestingly, improvement in any one intervention had no effect, suggesting that both on-farm and in-abattoir interventions may be required to achieve reduced carcass contamination.


    Presented by Julie Funk, DVM. MS. PhD, Michigan State University

    Summarized by Janet Alsop - Vet Disease Prevention, Swine Veterinary Services/OMAFRA
    June 2008 Pork News & Views - Government of Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs



    Published 09/26/2008
    中國畜牧人網(wǎng)站微信公眾號

    評分

    參與人數(shù) 1論壇幣 +1 收起 理由
    胡文輝 + 1 【通過審核】

    查看全部評分

    版權(quán)聲明:本文內(nèi)容來源互聯(lián)網(wǎng),僅供畜牧人網(wǎng)友學(xué)習(xí),文章及圖片版權(quán)歸原作者所有,如果有侵犯到您的權(quán)利,請及時聯(lián)系我們刪除(010-82893169-805)。
    沙發(fā)
    發(fā)表于 2008-9-27 13:34:37 | 只看該作者
    現(xiàn)在我們吃的還安全嗎???
    您需要登錄后才可以回帖 登錄 | 注冊

    本版積分規(guī)則

    發(fā)布主題 快速回復(fù) 返回列表 聯(lián)系我們

    關(guān)于社區(qū)|廣告合作|聯(lián)系我們|幫助中心|小黑屋|手機版| 京公網(wǎng)安備 11010802025824號

    北京宏牧偉業(yè)網(wǎng)絡(luò)科技有限公司 版權(quán)所有(京ICP備11016518號-1

    Powered by Discuz! X3.5  © 2001-2021 Comsenz Inc. GMT+8, 2025-9-18 23:08, 技術(shù)支持:溫州諸葛云網(wǎng)絡(luò)科技有限公司

    主站蜘蛛池模板: 桃园县| 新野县| 武邑县| 横山县| 合作市| 崇义县| 长春市| 达孜县| 宁明县| 灵寿县| 肇州县| 庄浪县| 泽库县| 交口县| 阿合奇县| 泰安市| 嵊泗县| 庆元县| 佳木斯市| 襄垣县| 潮安县| 镇康县| 凌源市| 天水市| 凉城县| 竹山县| 环江| 吕梁市| 兴安盟| 乌鲁木齐市| 肇庆市| 武平县| 东阿县| 萍乡市| 墨竹工卡县| 定日县| 阳春市| 新河县| 京山县| 共和县| 宁强县|